Educators Use Website
The first website “Educators Use” has lots of great learning
tools that enable faculty to develop their own tool box for educational
development. I found two articles that
are interesting and kind of related to each other. The first one is “Design thinking:
Theory & practice.” Design thinking
is not about technology use only or teaching someone how to think; design
thinking is “a proven and repeatable problem-solving protocol that any business
or profession can employ to achieve extraordinary results” (Corcorran &
Scott-Webber, 2013, p. 5). It does not
need a designer to design thinking, complex problems that require innovation
leads people to design high level thinking and use that design as a guide for
practice. The process of designing learners’ thinking passes through five steps
(empathizes, define, ideate, prototype, and test). These step go along with the core elements of
the instructional design theories that focus on experimenting and testing the
results for more effective learning, such as “constructivism theory.”
In the class room environment, “empathize” means that
educators need to understand the needs and the learning desire of their
students. “Define” means that faculty is
responsible to frame problems in a way that makes them as opportunities for
creative solutions. “Ideate” is the step of generating a range of possible
solutions. “prototype” step focuses on communicating the core elements of
solutions to others in the same group. The final step in the process of
designing thinking is to guide learners to understand what works and what doesn’t
work to improve solutions.
The second
article entitled “adapting eLearning for mobile: Learning from wonderful mistakes”
also talks about how to design new way to enhance eLearning using mobile
instead of making the process more complex. Because using desktop for eLearning is a different
experience from using smartphone. Clothier (2014) stated that “rather than
quickly jumping to adapt your eLearning modules for mobile, think of ways you
can supplement the eLearning you have rather than trying to duplicate it on a
small screen. Having eLearning on the desktop and something different on mobile
to support that eLearning is more powerful than duplication of content” (Para.
1). With the advanced technology, there
is always a lot that faculty need to learn in order to enhance the learning of
students. Learning new ways also comes from mistakes, so that mistakes can be a
way to understand what works and what does not. Trying to switch eLearning from computers to
smartphones is not an easy task, which might lead to some mistakes, but these
mistakes can be learning experiences instead of source of stress. However,
designing learning on smartphones requires certain instructions. The author mentioned 9 Levels of adaptation of
eLearning for mobile:
- Replicate the existing
content as is and have it be accessible on a smartphone.
- Duplicate existing
content and have it be viewable on a mobile device using responsive or
adaptive design techniques.
- Adapt the textual
content for mobile, keeping the existing graphics.
- Adapt both the textual
content and the graphics for mobile.
- Convert content to a
video or videos.
- Incorporate the content
into a quiz or knowledge check.
- Completely redesign the
content for mobile.
- Create supplementary or
supportive mobile content for the existing eLearning content.
- Create a learning game from the content.
References:
Corcorran, S. & Scott-Webber, L. (2013). Design
thinking: Theory and practice. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/design-thinking-theory-and-practice
Clothier,
P. (2014). Adapting elearning for mobile”: Learning from wonderful mistakes.
Retrieved from http://www.learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/1498/adapting-elearning-for-mobile-learning-from-wonderful-mistakes
Atomic Learning Website
Atomic Learning provides an online
technology training for educator who teach at higher educational level. Their online tutorials can be accessed by universities
to educate faculty, staff, and students on how to use and apply variety types
of technologies that have been designed to improve learning. Atomic
learning has such interesting case studies that provide instructions and explain
the proper use of technology to enhance learning. The first case study that I
reviewed entitled “Shaping college
curriculum with online videos,” which talks about the importance of switching
world document to audio-visual. Technology becomes a part in the educational
process; therefore, the demand to develop learning materials that can be viewed
in different ways is increased. Both educators
and learners usually view videos when they buy new device in order to
understand how that device or certain software works. However, in terms of teaching and learning using
technology, there is a high demand for technology training from students and
staff. Therefore, the goal of Atomic learning is to provide wide technology
training resources that are easy to use online. These training materials
provide easy to use instructions that help to design learning using technology
(Stange, 2013)..
The second
case study that I reviewed talks about “utilizing atomic learning to flip the
college classroom.” Educators find that flipping classroom learning technique
is more dynamic and interactive that the traditional learning environment.
Educators also find positive impact of new techniques on the learning outcomes,
so flipping classroom environment is recommended to make learning process more
productive. I still remember that Dr. Korvic presented flipping classroom in
the conference about two years ago and she clearly explained how effective the
learning would be with the new learning environment. However, the challenge is that traditional
students do not have computer skills that enable them to navigate the change in
the learning style. Therefore, Atomic Learning tutorials were provided to
improve students’ computer skills. In the schools that review these learning
tutorials, the level of students’ satisfaction was high and students learned
where to find help when they need it. Leitgeb
(2013) reported that Atomic Learning is pivotal to the class’s success, because
using these tutorials helps to create an environment that improve collaborative
learning, which leads to increase student satisfaction about using new learning
environment, such as flip classroom.
References:
Stange, M.(2013).
Shaping college curriculum with online videos. Retrieved from http://blog.atomiclearning.com/highed/case-studies
Leitgeb, R.
(2013). Utilizing atomic learning to flip the college classroom. Retrieved
from http://blog.atomiclearning.com/highed/case-studies
Hayder,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your post and I would like to expound more on the concept of flipping classroom as an important instructional tool that has the ability to upgrade the learning experience to the next level. Applying this nontraditional instructional approach is consistent with the educational paradigms shift in the third millennium (Stanley & Dougherty 2010). Moving from teacher-centered instructional design to learner-centered is the landmark of our time. King (1993) draws our attention to this shift by indicating that both educators and learners must redefine their role according to the following paradigm shift: from sage on the stage to guide on the side. An inverted or flipped classroom is a revolutionary pedagogical model that considers modern learning theories in terms of learner-centered methodology as its core infrastructure. Critz and Knight (2013) defined it as is an instructional style that assigns learners to study cyber-based materials, review up-to-date published papers, and thoroughly reflect on previously assigned readings. Consequently, learners will be armed with the required knowledge to enthusiastically join in synergistic learning experiences in the class environment through, for example, critical reasoning case scenarios, group symposium, or other effective, collaborative learning actions. Mason, Shuman, and Cook (2013) concluded that the inverted classroom pedagogy let the teacher cover more contents. In addition to this, students significantly increased their participation compared with traditional learning environments.
References
King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College teaching, 41(1), 30-35.
Critz, C. M., & Knight, D. (2013). Using the Flipped Classroom in Graduate Nursing Education. Nurse Educator, 38(5), 210-213.
Mason, G. S., Shuman, T., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 430-435.
Stanley, M. J. C., & Dougherty, J. P. (2010). A paradigm shift in nursing education: A new model. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(6), 378-80.
Hayder,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your blog. Isn't it fascinating how we can all bring new information on the topic to the table? I liked the visual diagram that you discussed: Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype, Test. I think it is very important to empathize with the students and identify the students needs. Each student is different. Each step in the instructional design process is important. Following each step and developing that particular step to the fullest will lead to a very refined end product, which in turn increases student interaction and promotes higher levels of thinking.
The nine levels for adaption will be very useful for students. Again, each student is so different in his learning needs depending on his level of experience and comfort with technology. It is important for faculty to be well versed at multiple forms of technology. This assists students in trouble shooting problems during critical times, such as during an exam.
I absolutely love the Atomic Learning website. It is full of a lot of really great information and invaluable resources. I also remember the conference where Dr. Korvic presented the Flipped Classroom. Flipping the classroom and changing your teaching style is very difficult, not only for the faculty member, but also for the students.
Thanks for sharing such great information!
Rachel
Hi Hayder
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with what you stated in your post about increasing usage of Smartphone as a new technology in education. A majority of college students use Smartphone or some type of mobile electronic device (MED) on a daily basis. It is a familiar resource for everything from personal status updates, breaking news, class calendars, and information “apps” (applications). As these college students enter healthcare education, it is important to adopt attitudes of acceptance of the MED as a rapid access to information that allows for more informed decisions to be made, which can enhance student learning and ultimately improve patient outcomes (Calabretto, Thomas, Rossi, & Beilby, 2014).
Using e-books and web-based resources for education in an ever increasing volume, nursing students are left with limited availability of resources for information in the clinical setting. A Smartphone can be defined as a device that offers telephone service and data services such as email, calendaring, a web browser, and storage for contact lists. Besides that, Smartphone offer access to internet services. A potent mix of intuitive user interfaces, data access, and most importantly applications make Smartphone a natural place to find a convenient customer experience. Smartphone is now seen as a pocket computer and a personal assistant. They are usable as a kind of always-available knowledge machine and everyone walks around with the devices that can tell them about anything they would like to know (Smith-Stoner, 2012).
References
Calabretto, J., Thomas, J., Rossi, S., & Beilby, J. (2014). Medical student experiences of a
smartphone delivered drug information resource. Electronic Journal of Health Informatics,
8(2),1-11.
Smith-Stoner, M. (2012). Class is about to start: Please turn on your cell phones: 10 uses for cell
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis is an excellent post and covers a variety of content. I have always like the idea of flipped classroom and we have had several guest speakers at the university to talk about this topic. Some speaker believe that you must flip a whole course, I however believe that you can flip specific modules. In fact, this may be a more effective approach in nursing education. Unfortunately, the students are nor prepared for the method of education and are very resistant to any change. They cannot see the tangible benefits and will not believe that any other instructional method would be effective. How can we get them to WANT to try it (100% buy-in) and avoid coercion?
ReplyDelete